URNM vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
URNM and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URNM is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both URNM and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
URNM vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URNM vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 15.05% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 3.70% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 7.24% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 1.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 7.24% return.
URNM
- 1D
- 8.06%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 101.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 86.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URNM vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URNM vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
URNM
NLR
URNM vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNM | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.06 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 2.63 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.26 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 7.88 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNM | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.06 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.83 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.18 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and NLR is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
URNM vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than NLR's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.38% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
URNM vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNM | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | -65.05% | +14.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.79% | -25.80% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.78% | -30.48% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.81% | -18.97% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -35.91% | +18.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.08% | 10.67% | +0.41% |
Volatility
URNM vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
NorthShore Global Uranium Mining ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 18.90% compared to VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) at 14.04%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URNM | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.90% | 14.04% | +4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.47% | 32.94% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | 42.23% | +9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.02% | 28.16% | +19.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.76% | 23.39% | +23.37% |