PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCLR vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-4.88%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%6.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


XCLR

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCLR vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCLR^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.92

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.41

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.41

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

6.61

-1.38

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCLR^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.92

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.46

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and ^GSPC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCLR^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-56.78%

+42.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-12.14%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.45%

-5.78%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-10.75%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.60%

-0.58%

Volatility

XCLR vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is 3.42%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that XCLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCLR^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

5.37%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

9.55%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

18.33%

-7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

16.90%

-6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

18.05%

-7.47%