PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URFRX vs. USAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URFRX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URFRX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, URFRX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


URFRX

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.27%
6M
10.83%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
9.43%

USAGX

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
4.39%
1Y
57.01%
3Y*
39.62%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URFRX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
10.27%17.49%10.37%16.75%-14.86%15.88%9.22%19.57%-8.52%18.48%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-1.56%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between URFRX and USAGX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2008

0.36

The correlation between URFRX and USAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URFRX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URFRX
URFRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
URFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
URFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URFRX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URFRXUSAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

1.91

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

4.90

+9.42

URFRX vs. USAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the USAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URFRX and USAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URFRXUSAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.35

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.53

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.40

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.18

+0.34

Drawdowns

URFRX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URFRX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URFRX and USAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URFRXUSAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-80.89%

+41.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-30.12%

+23.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.41%

-30.12%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.27%

-45.72%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.59%

-51.03%

+22.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-26.33%

+25.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-43.08%

+37.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

11.72%

-10.15%

Volatility

URFRX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) is 3.06%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that URFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URFRXUSAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

14.31%

-11.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

35.35%

-27.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.43%

42.70%

-33.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.33%

32.86%

-20.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

32.68%

-19.60%

URFRX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URFRX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

URFRX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison

URFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than USAGX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.39%7.05%2.78%3.94%10.68%7.78%5.49%12.74%9.99%6.53%3.95%2.55%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.24%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URFRX and USAGX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to URFRX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URFRX dropped -39.33% vs USAGX's -80.89%.

URFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URFRX and USAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer