UPS vs. EQT
UPS (United Parcel Service, Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. UPS operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, UPS returned 4.31%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for EQT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UPS vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 4.31%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.
UPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 11.65%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- -9.66%
- 5Y*
- -7.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
EQT
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -5.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
UPS vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 12.37% | -15.93% | -15.93% | -5.96% | -16.21% | 30.02% | 48.64% | 24.24% | -15.48% | 7.14% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.55% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPS and EQT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 1999 | 0.26 |
The correlation between UPS and EQT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UPS:
$91.89B
EQT:
$32.47B
UPS:
$6.18
EQT:
$5.40
UPS:
17.49
EQT:
9.61
UPS:
1.04
EQT:
3.21
UPS:
5.83
EQT:
1.29
UPS:
$88.34B
EQT:
$10.03B
UPS:
$16.03B
EQT:
$6.43B
UPS:
$10.63B
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPS vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
UPS
EQT
UPS vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.00 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.22 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | -0.47 | +1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPS vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum EQT drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.92% | -91.51% | +33.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -24.42% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.71% | -31.62% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.92% | -42.56% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.92% | -88.28% | +30.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.22% | -23.32% | -18.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -23.34% | +8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.93% | 11.47% | +0.46% |
Volatility
UPS vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.36%. This indicates that UPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 8.36% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 21.09% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.72% | 32.56% | -2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 42.79% | -14.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 48.90% | -21.29% |
Dividends
UPS vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than EQT's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
UPS United Parcel Service, Inc. | 6.07% | 6.61% | 5.17% | 4.12% | 3.50% | 1.90% | 2.40% | 3.28% | 3.73% | 2.79% | 2.72% | 3.03% |
Financials
UPS vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Parcel Service, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UPS vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
UPS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
UPS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
UPS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UPS and EQT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPS has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs EQT's -91.51%.
UPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPS and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer