UPGR vs. XES

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UPGR returned 51.55% vs 73.84% for XES. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

UPGR vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 34.60% return.

UPGR

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: 11.51%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 51.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XES

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -15.10%
• YTD: 34.60%
• 6M: 35.81%
• 1Y: 73.84%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: -3.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGR vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	11.51%	35.25%	-14.72%	-15.29%
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	34.60%	5.89%	-5.44%	-3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and XES is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.44

The correlation between UPGR and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UPGR vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPGR	XES
Industrials	49.3%	2.9%
Utilities	12.8%	-
Basic Materials	10.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Energy	10.0%	97.1%
Technology	3.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UPGR vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 54
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

XES

XES Risk / Return Rank: 80
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGR vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPGR	XES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.39	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.03	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	4.21	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	16.87	-9.61

UPGR vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGR Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGR and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and XES.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGR	XES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-95.65%	+49.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.55%	-17.65%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-91.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.98%	-74.01%	+63.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.30%	-54.40%	+34.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	4.39%	+2.73%

Volatility

UPGR vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 10.65%. This indicates that UPGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPGR	XES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.17%	10.65%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	21.09%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.65%	31.04%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.83%	39.04%	-8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.83%	44.97%	-14.14%

UPGR vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UPGR and XES have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

UPGR vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than XES's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.29%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF	1.19%	1.69%	1.31%	0.66%	0.36%	1.81%	1.33%	1.43%	1.14%	1.68%	0.64%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGR and XES in my portfolio?

UPGR and XES have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPGR or XES?

UPGR has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to XES (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs XES's -95.65%.

Which ETF is better, UPGR or XES?

On 1-year performance, XES leads with 73.84% vs 51.55% for UPGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XES has been the lower-risk option at 10.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPGR or XES?

Over the 1-year period, XES has performed better with a 73.84% return vs 51.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGR or XES?

UPGR and XES have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGR or XES?

XES has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.29% for UPGR.

What is the main difference between UPGR and XES?

UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.