UPGR vs. XAIX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UPGR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UPGR returned 32.03% vs 41.98% for XAIX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

UPGR vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 26.34% return.

UPGR

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -4.54%
• 6M: -0.75%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 1Y: 32.03%
• 3Y*: 2.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAIX

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: -6.65%
• 6M: 25.39%
• YTD: 26.34%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGR vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	6.84%	35.25%	-5.31%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	26.34%	29.05%	15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and XAIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024	0.59

The correlation between UPGR and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPGR vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UPGR	XAIX
Industrials	56.6%	0.1%
Energy	11.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	9.7%	0.0%
Utilities	8.6%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	7.1%
Technology	3.7%	77.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	0.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	4.0%
Communication Services	-	11.3%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

UPGR vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 35
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 30
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGR vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UPGR	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.68	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.21	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	3.01	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	9.00	-4.83

UPGR vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGR and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than XAIX's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and XAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGR	XAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-23.95%	-22.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.90%	-14.01%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.70%	-11.04%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.14%	-3.74%	-16.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.70%	4.68%	+3.02%

Volatility

UPGR vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) have volatilities of 10.85% and 11.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPGR	XAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.85%	11.29%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.22%	22.57%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.43%	25.17%	+7.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.98%	25.02%	+5.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.98%	25.02%	+5.96%

UPGR vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UPGR and XAIX have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

UPGR vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than XAIX's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.30%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPGR and XAIX in my portfolio?

UPGR and XAIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPGR or XAIX?

XAIX has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to UPGR (10.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, UPGR or XAIX?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 41.98% vs 32.03% for UPGR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, UPGR has been the lower-risk option at 10.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPGR or XAIX?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 41.98% return vs 32.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPGR or XAIX?

UPGR and XAIX have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPGR or XAIX?

XAIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.30% for UPGR.

What is the main difference between UPGR and XAIX?

UPGR is categorized as Energy Equities, while XAIX is Technology Equities. UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XAIX tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.