PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHU vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UNHU

1D
10.16%
1M
17.42%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMF

1D
0.57%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-5.59%
6M
-9.73%
1Y
-3.14%
3Y*
-20.49%
5Y*
-30.44%
10Y*
-16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHU and TMF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHU

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNHUTMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

57.76

-0.13

+57.90

Drawdowns

UNHU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHUTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-92.89%

+81.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-92.18%

+89.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-43.64%

+40.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

Volatility

UNHU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHUTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.61%

28.76%

+40.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.61%

46.72%

+22.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.61%

43.91%

+25.70%

UNHU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

UNHU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

UNHU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.13%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%
UNHU
Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNHU and TMF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UNHU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UNHU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.00% for UNHU.

UNHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 1.01% for TMF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHU and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer