UNHU vs. EVMT
UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) and EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. UNHU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EVMT.
Performance
UNHU vs. EVMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UNHU
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 10.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMT
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 29.69%
- 3Y*
- -0.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHU vs. EVMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 142.44% |
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHU and EVMT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2026 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHU vs. EVMT — Risk / Return Rank
UNHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EVMT
UNHU vs. EVMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNHU | EVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNHU vs. EVMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum EVMT drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and EVMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHU | EVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -48.34% | +36.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -28.12% | +27.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -34.51% | +31.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.57% | — |
Volatility
UNHU vs. EVMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHU | EVMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.66% | 15.56% | +47.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.66% | 20.40% | +42.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.66% | 20.40% | +42.26% |
UNHU vs. EVMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EVMT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHU vs. EVMT - Dividend Comparison
UNHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than EVMT's 11.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 11.33% | 11.80% | 3.62% | 5.49% | 0.86% |
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHU and EVMT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVMT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVMT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.
EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.33%, compared with 0.42% for UNHU.
UNHU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EVMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 0.59% for EVMT.
Find the right allocation for UNHU and EVMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer