UNHU vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

UNHU vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

UNHU

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHU vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	86.70%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-45.07%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHU and BMNG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.07

Return for Risk

UNHU vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UNHU	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	38.25	-0.52	+38.77

Drawdowns

UNHU vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHU drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHU and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHU	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.68%	-95.36%	+83.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.68%	-95.36%	+83.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-81.38%	+78.39%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHU	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.42%	191.58%	-124.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.42%	191.58%	-124.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.42%	191.58%	-124.16%

UNHU vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHU vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither UNHU nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHU and BMNG in my portfolio?

UNHU and BMNG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHU or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHU or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHU or BMNG?

UNHU and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between UNHU and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for UNHU and 0.75% for BMNG.