UNG vs. RRC
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC).
UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007.
Performance
UNG vs. RRC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNG vs. RRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -4.32% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
RRC Range Resources Corporation | 28.43% | -1.05% | 19.35% | 23.05% | 41.10% | 166.12% | 38.14% | -48.60% | -43.60% | -50.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -4.32% return, which is significantly lower than RRC's 28.43% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed RRC with an annualized return of -19.74%, while RRC has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -10.25%
- 1Y
- -45.72%
- 3Y*
- -24.96%
- 5Y*
- -21.28%
- 10Y*
- -19.74%
RRC
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 28.43%
- 6M
- 20.61%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 33.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. RRC — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
RRC
UNG vs. RRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | RRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | 0.39 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | 0.73 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.10 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.68 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 1.16 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | RRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 0.39 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.72 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.36 | 0.07 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.17 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and RRC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UNG vs. RRC - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RRC Range Resources Corporation | 0.82% | 1.02% | 0.89% | 1.05% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.84% | 0.47% | 0.23% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
UNG vs. RRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, roughly equal to the maximum RRC drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and RRC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | RRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -97.86% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.53% | -24.15% | -28.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.42% | -37.66% | -54.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.49% | -95.72% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -48.28% | -51.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.87% | -46.57% | -43.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.10% | 14.09% | +22.01% |
Volatility
UNG vs. RRC - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to Range Resources Corporation (RRC) at 8.58%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | RRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.68% | 8.58% | +6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.10% | 25.20% | +28.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.87% | 37.01% | +26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.90% | 46.94% | +16.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.87% | 56.88% | -2.01% |