UNG vs. UNL
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL).
UNG and UNL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007. UNL is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the 12 Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Nov 18, 2009. Both UNG and UNL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UNG vs. UNL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UNG vs. UNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -6.85% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
UNL United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP | -8.13% | -9.67% | -4.78% | -50.20% | 47.01% | 54.42% | -9.54% | -18.78% | 12.53% | -21.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly higher than UNL's -8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed UNL with an annualized return of -19.95%, while UNL has yielded a comparatively higher -2.62% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -16.15%
- 1Y
- -44.83%
- 3Y*
- -25.63%
- 5Y*
- -21.70%
- 10Y*
- -19.95%
UNL
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -8.13%
- 6M
- -15.46%
- 1Y
- -32.00%
- 3Y*
- -16.34%
- 5Y*
- -3.07%
- 10Y*
- -2.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNG vs. UNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than UNL's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. UNL — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
UNL
UNG vs. UNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | -0.82 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | -1.03 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.87 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.93 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -1.53 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | -0.82 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | -0.07 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.36 | -0.08 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.39 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and UNL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UNG vs. UNL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNG nor UNL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UNG vs. UNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than UNL's maximum drawdown of -88.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and UNL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -88.52% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.53% | -36.28% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.42% | -77.17% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.49% | -77.17% | -16.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -87.99% | -11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.87% | -73.20% | -16.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.11% | 22.12% | +13.99% |
Volatility
UNG vs. UNL - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund LP (UNL) at 11.07%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | UNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | 11.07% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.12% | 32.27% | +21.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.90% | 39.11% | +24.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.91% | 41.69% | +22.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.87% | 33.81% | +21.06% |