UNG vs. LNG
UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas, while LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, UNG returned -20.65%/yr vs 22.19%/yr for LNG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UNG vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 22.01% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -20.65%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 22.19% annualized return.
UNG
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- -23.33%
- 1Y
- -32.01%
- 3Y*
- -21.73%
- 5Y*
- -23.24%
- 10Y*
- -20.65%
LNG
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -12.41%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- -2.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.20%
- 10Y*
- 22.19%
UNG vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -6.44% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 22.01% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and LNG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNG vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
UNG
LNG
UNG vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UNG | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | -0.07 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 0.09 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.01 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.02 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 0.05 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNG | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | -0.07 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.77 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.38 | 0.68 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.16 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
UNG vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNG | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.88% | -97.84% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.86% | -24.09% | -19.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.16% | -24.87% | -43.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.49% | -24.87% | -67.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.55% | -57.53% | -36.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.86% | -20.33% | -79.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.96% | -43.17% | -46.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.59% | 11.43% | +18.16% |
Volatility
UNG vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 9.69%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNG | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.11% | 9.69% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.02% | 21.74% | +31.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.90% | 27.75% | +33.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.09% | 30.27% | +33.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.79% | 32.67% | +22.12% |
Dividends
UNG vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNG and LNG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNG has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to LNG (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UNG and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer