PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNG vs. LNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNG vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 22.01% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -20.65%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 22.19% annualized return.


UNG

1D
-0.61%
1M
7.10%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
-23.33%
1Y
-32.01%
3Y*
-21.73%
5Y*
-23.24%
10Y*
-20.65%

LNG

1D
3.57%
1M
-12.41%
YTD
22.01%
6M
13.33%
1Y
-2.02%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
23.20%
10Y*
22.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNG vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-6.44%-27.07%-17.11%-64.04%12.89%35.76%-45.43%-31.77%5.96%-37.58%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
22.01%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%3.18%9.94%29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UNG and LNG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNG vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNG
UNG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
UNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNG vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UNGLNGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

-0.07

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

0.09

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.01

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

0.02

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

0.05

-0.96

UNG vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNG and LNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UNGLNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

-0.07

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.77

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.38

0.68

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

0.16

-0.73

Drawdowns

UNG vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and LNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNGLNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.88%

-97.84%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.86%

-24.09%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.16%

-24.87%

-43.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.49%

-24.87%

-67.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.55%

-57.53%

-36.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.86%

-20.33%

-79.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.96%

-43.17%

-46.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.59%

11.43%

+18.16%

Volatility

UNG vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 13.11% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 9.69%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNGLNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.11%

9.69%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.02%

21.74%

+31.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.90%

27.75%

+33.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.09%

30.27%

+33.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.79%

32.67%

+22.12%

Dividends

UNG vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.92%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UNG and LNG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNG has higher volatility (13.11%) compared to LNG (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UNG dropped -99.88% vs LNG's -97.84%.

LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNG and LNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer