UNG vs. BNO
Compare and contrast key facts about United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO).
UNG and BNO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UNG is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Natural Gas. It was launched on Apr 18, 2007. BNO is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. It was launched on Jun 2, 2010. Both UNG and BNO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UNG or BNO.
Key characteristics
| UNG | BNO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -30.28% | 13.58% |
| 1Y Return | -45.53% | 22.75% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -30.49% | 22.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -30.81% | 8.87% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -28.73% | -3.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.87 | 0.60 |
| Daily Std Dev | 54.81% | 27.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.83% | -87.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.83% | -33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNG and BNO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
UNG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UNG achieves a -30.28% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, UNG has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of -28.73%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher -3.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UNG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UNG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UNG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNG nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UNG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNG drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, which is greater than BNO's maximum drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNG and BNO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UNG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a higher volatility of 15.19% compared to United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) at 5.43%. This indicates that UNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.