UMMA vs. EFAV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - UMMA tracks the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index while EFAV tracks the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UMMA returned 22.81%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for EFAV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UMMA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

UMMA vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMMA achieves a 32.32% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 4.42% return.

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 5.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMA vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.62%
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	4.42%	26.00%	5.30%	12.52%	-13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UMMA and EFAV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022	0.70

The correlation between UMMA and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMMA vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMMA	EFAV
Technology	42.9%	4.5%
Healthcare	16.6%	12.4%
Industrials	13.5%	15.1%
Basic Materials	9.3%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	11.5%
Energy	2.9%	8.2%
Communication Services	0.8%	9.7%
Real Estate	0.5%	2.9%
Financial Services	-	19.9%
Utilities	-	9.1%

Return for Risk

UMMA vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 28
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMA vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMMA	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	0.95	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	1.38	+2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.17	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	1.52	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.60	4.22	+9.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMMA vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMMA and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMMA	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	0.95	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.54	+0.04

Drawdowns

UMMA vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and EFAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMMA	EFAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-27.56%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-6.46%	-8.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-8.75%	-9.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-5.07%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-4.77%	-5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	2.32%	+1.50%

Volatility

UMMA vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.14%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMMA	EFAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	3.14%	+4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.26%	8.19%	+9.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.11%	10.32%	+9.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	11.79%	+8.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	13.21%	+7.34%

UMMA vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMMA vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than EFAV's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMMA and EFAV in my portfolio?

UMMA and EFAV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMMA or EFAV?

UMMA has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to EFAV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMMA dropped -34.17% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

Which ETF is better, UMMA or EFAV?

On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 22.81% vs 13.24% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMMA or EFAV?

Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMMA or EFAV?

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMMA or EFAV?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between UMMA and EFAV?

UMMA tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UMMA and 0.20% for EFAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.