UMMA vs. SPRE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) and SPRE (SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UMMA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Wahed, while SPRE is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global All Equity REIT Shariah Capped Index. UMMA is actively managed, while SPRE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UMMA returned 24.05%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SPRE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UMMA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SPRE.

Performance

UMMA vs. SPRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMMA achieves a 36.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPRE's 10.27% return.

UMMA

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 10.02%
• YTD: 36.44%
• 6M: 38.86%
• 1Y: 59.49%
• 3Y*: 24.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPRE

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.31%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMA vs. SPRE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	36.44%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.31%
SPRE SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF	10.27%	3.07%	2.11%	9.40%	-25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UMMA and SPRE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022	0.52

The correlation between UMMA and SPRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMMA vs. SPRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMMA	SPRE
Technology	48.2%	-
Healthcare	14.8%	-
Industrials	12.1%	-
Basic Materials	8.8%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Energy	2.4%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-0.2%
Real Estate	0.4%	84.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	-0.0%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

UMMA vs. SPRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 82
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

SPRE

SPRE Risk / Return Rank: 28
SPRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SPRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SPRE Omega Ratio Rank: 26
SPRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SPRE Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMA vs. SPRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMMA	SPRE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	0.98	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	1.41	+2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.18	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	1.38	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.38	4.79	+10.59

UMMA vs. SPRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the SPRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMMA and SPRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMMA vs. SPRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, smaller than the maximum SPRE drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and SPRE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMMA	SPRE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-38.34%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-9.63%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-22.04%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.48%	+10.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.73%	-17.85%	+8.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	2.78%	+1.10%

Volatility

UMMA vs. SPRE - Volatility Comparison

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 10.71% compared to SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF (SPRE) at 4.66%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMMA	SPRE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.71%	4.66%	+6.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.57%	10.16%	+9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.16%	13.64%	+8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	18.79%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	18.40%	+2.55%

UMMA vs. SPRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SPRE's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

UMMA vs. SPRE - Dividend Comparison

UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than SPRE's 3.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SPRE SP Funds S&P Global REIT Sharia ETF	3.78%	4.10%	4.13%	4.16%	4.17%	2.83%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.90%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMMA and SPRE in my portfolio?

UMMA and SPRE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMMA or SPRE?

UMMA has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to SPRE (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMMA dropped -34.17% vs SPRE's -38.34%.

Which ETF is better, UMMA or SPRE?

On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 24.05% vs 8.33% for SPRE. On fees, UMMA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SPRE has been the lower-risk option at 4.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMMA or SPRE?

Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 24.05% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMMA or SPRE?

UMMA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SPRE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMMA or SPRE?

SPRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.90% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between UMMA and SPRE?

UMMA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPRE is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UMMA and 0.69% for SPRE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.