UMDD vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UMDD returned 13.11%/yr vs 36.27%/yr for QLD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UMDD vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 38.16% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 29.58% return. Over the past 10 years, UMDD has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 13.11%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.27% annualized return.

UMDD

• 1D: -2.96%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 38.16%
• 6M: 30.23%
• 1Y: 64.17%
• 3Y*: 25.89%
• 5Y*: 3.07%
• 10Y*: 13.11%

QLD

• 1D: -6.61%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 29.58%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 66.80%
• 3Y*: 43.61%
• 5Y*: 21.41%
• 10Y*: 36.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	38.16%	-2.57%	19.68%	27.21%	-49.60%	72.27%	-17.30%	78.90%	-40.29%	49.17%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	29.58%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and QLD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.73

The correlation between UMDD and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UMDD vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UMDD	QLD
Industrials	24.8%	2.6%
Technology	17.9%	58.7%
Financial Services	13.6%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	11.4%
Healthcare	9.1%	3.7%
Real Estate	7.3%	0.1%
Energy	4.9%	0.5%
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	6.4%
Utilities	2.9%	1.2%
Communication Services	1.0%	14.3%

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 45
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UMDD	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.88	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.33	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.67	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	9.05	-0.77

UMDD vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-83.13%	-3.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.04%	-25.13%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.33%	-42.29%	-18.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	-63.68%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	-63.68%	-22.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.38%	-9.26%	+3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-18.14%	-5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.77%	7.40%	+0.37%

Volatility

UMDD vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 13.54%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.54%	18.22%	-4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.31%	28.95%	+6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.51%	35.77%	+11.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.96%	45.34%	+13.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.23%	44.80%	+17.43%

UMDD vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UMDD and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UMDD vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	0.76%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UMDD and QLD in my portfolio?

UMDD and QLD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UMDD or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to UMDD (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMDD dropped -86.24% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, UMDD or QLD?

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.27% vs 13.11% for UMDD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 13.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UMDD or QLD?

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.27% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UMDD or QLD?

UMDD and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UMDD or QLD?

UMDD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between UMDD and QLD?

UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.