UMDD vs. HOOG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG).

UMDD and HOOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMDD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). It was launched on Feb 9, 2010. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

UMDD vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMDD vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	5.14%	19.85%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-67.70%	291.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMDD achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -67.70% return.

UMDD

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -17.06%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 28.13%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: -1.48%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

HOOG

• 1D: 2.51%
• 1M: -24.23%
• YTD: -67.70%
• 6M: -82.07%
• 1Y: 43.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMDD vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

UMDD

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

UMDD vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMDD

UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 30
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 32
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMDD vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMDD	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.30	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	1.50	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.18	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	0.53	+0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.84	1.11	+1.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMDD vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMDD Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMDD and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMDD	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	0.30	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.18	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between UMDD and HOOG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UMDD vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

UMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than HOOG's 38.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UMDD ProShares UltraPro MidCap400	1.00%	1.00%	0.76%	0.19%	0.49%	0.06%	0.08%	0.64%	0.32%	0.00%	0.03%	0.06%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	38.10%	12.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UMDD vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMDD drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMDD and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMDD	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.24%	-86.94%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.30%	-86.94%	+48.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.99%	-84.94%	+56.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-30.17%	+6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.66%	41.37%	-30.71%

Volatility

UMDD vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) is 19.56%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.44%. This indicates that UMDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMDD	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.56%	35.44%	-15.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.08%	100.78%	-64.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.30%	143.11%	-79.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.88%	143.62%	-84.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.19%	143.62%	-81.43%