PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULVM vs. PWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULVM vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 21.58% return.


ULVM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.46%
6M
15.22%
YTD
20.05%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.18%

PWV

1D
0.13%
1M
4.66%
6M
18.00%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
12.37%
ALL TIME*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.04M$7.39M$4.81M
$297.74K$260.49K$217.66K

ULVM vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
20.05%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.11%
PWV
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF
21.58%19.65%14.48%10.36%-1.16%29.06%-3.77%29.84%-14.12%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and PWV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.89

The correlation between ULVM and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULVM vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PWV
PWV Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULVM vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULVMPWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.60

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

7.91

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.50

28.36

-8.86

ULVM vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and PWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULVMPWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-49.04%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-4.05%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-14.31%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.77%

-16.36%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.90%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-9.43%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.13%

+0.40%

Volatility

ULVM vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.72%, while Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULVMPWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.91%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

7.24%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

9.69%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

14.28%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

17.14%

+1.59%

ULVM vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULVM vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than PWV's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWV
Invesco Large Cap Value ETF
1.65%2.12%2.08%2.16%2.29%1.89%2.66%2.24%2.34%1.55%2.35%2.42%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.62%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ULVM and PWV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWV has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to ULVM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs PWV's -49.04%.

On 5-year performance, PWV leads with 15.05% vs 12.55% for ULVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PWV has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PWV.

PWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.62% for ULVM.

ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while PWV is Large Cap Value Equities. ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: Victory and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.55% for PWV.

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULVM and PWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer