ULS vs. AEM
ULS (UL Solutions Inc) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. ULS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, ULS returned 40.78% vs 41.42% for AEM. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULS vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULS achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's 1.68% return.
ULS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEM
- 1D
- -4.07%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 41.42%
- 3Y*
- 51.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
ULS vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 24.71% | 59.33% | 43.88% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.68% | 119.53% | 29.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULS and AEM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2024 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
ULS:
$20.00B
AEM:
$86.12B
ULS:
$1.71
AEM:
$10.60
ULS:
57.16
AEM:
16.20
ULS:
5.14
AEM:
0.25
ULS:
6.42
AEM:
6.39
ULS:
14.97
AEM:
3.28
ULS:
$3.11B
AEM:
$13.51B
ULS:
$1.54B
AEM:
$8.28B
ULS:
$725.35M
AEM:
$9.72B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULS vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
ULS
AEM
ULS vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULS | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.31 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 3.29 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULS | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.17 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
ULS vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULS drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULS and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULS | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -90.49% | +66.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.34% | -31.77% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -31.77% | +25.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -46.66% | +41.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 12.61% | -3.08% |
Volatility
ULS vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
UL Solutions Inc (ULS) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 13.70%. This indicates that ULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULS | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 13.70% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.27% | 34.59% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.32% | 43.02% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 36.80% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 37.22% | -1.36% |
Dividends
ULS vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
ULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than AEM's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.99% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ULS vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UL Solutions Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULS vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
ULS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 381.00M and revenue of 758.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
ULS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
ULS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULS and AEM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULS has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to AEM (13.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULS dropped -24.34% vs AEM's -90.49%.
ULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULS and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer