ULS vs. VC
ULS (UL Solutions Inc) and VC (Visteon Corporation) are both stocks. ULS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while VC operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, ULS returned 40.78% vs 48.29% for VC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULS vs. VC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULS achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly lower than VC's 30.42% return.
ULS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VC
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 30.42%
- 6M
- 22.03%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- -4.03%
- 5Y*
- -1.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
ULS vs. VC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 24.71% | 59.33% | 43.88% |
VC Visteon Corporation | 30.42% | 7.73% | -18.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULS and VC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
ULS:
$1.71
VC:
$9.66
ULS:
57.16
VC:
12.74
ULS:
5.14
VC:
0.12
ULS:
6.42
VC:
0.68
ULS:
$3.11B
VC:
$3.79B
ULS:
$1.54B
VC:
$507.00M
ULS:
$725.35M
VC:
$391.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULS vs. VC — Risk / Return Rank
ULS
VC
ULS vs. VC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Visteon Corporation (VC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULS | VC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.43 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 2.73 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULS | VC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.23 | +1.55 |
Drawdowns
ULS vs. VC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULS drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum VC drawdown of -70.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULS and VC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULS | VC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -70.89% | +46.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.34% | -33.97% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -27.22% | +20.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -23.04% | +17.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 17.73% | -8.20% |
Volatility
ULS vs. VC - Volatility Comparison
UL Solutions Inc (ULS) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Visteon Corporation (VC) at 10.48%. This indicates that ULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULS | VC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 10.48% | +6.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.27% | 29.33% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.32% | 37.26% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 38.96% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 41.63% | -5.77% |
Dividends
ULS vs. VC - Dividend Comparison
ULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than VC's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VC Visteon Corporation | 1.06% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 54.02% |
Financials
ULS vs. VC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UL Solutions Inc and Visteon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULS vs. VC - Profitability Comparison
ULS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 381.00M and revenue of 758.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.
VC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a gross profit of 113.00M and revenue of 954.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.
ULS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
VC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visteon Corporation reported an operating income of 59.00M and revenue of 954.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.
ULS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
VC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a net income of 65.00M and revenue of 954.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULS and VC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ULS has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to VC (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULS dropped -24.34% vs VC's -70.89%.
VC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULS and VC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer