ULS vs. VC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Visteon Corporation (VC).

Performance

ULS vs. VC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Visteon Corporation (VC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ULS vs. VC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ULS UL Solutions Inc	8.87%	59.33%	43.88%
VC Visteon Corporation	-3.82%	7.73%	-18.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ULS : $19.02B VC : $2.52B
EPS ULS : $1.57 VC : $16.69
PE Ratio ULS : 54.52 VC : 5.46
PEG Ratio ULS : 4.97 VC : 0.05
PS Ratio ULS : 5.88 VC : 0.67
PB Ratio ULS : 14.70 VC : 1.61
Total Revenue (TTM) ULS : $3.05B VC : $3.77B
Gross Profit (TTM) ULS : $1.50B VC : $532.00M
EBITDA (TTM) ULS : $751.00M VC : $395.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULS achieves a 8.87% return, which is significantly higher than VC's -3.82% return.

ULS

• 1D: 4.27%
• 1M: 2.25%
• YTD: 8.87%
• 6M: 21.34%
• 1Y: 53.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VC

• 1D: 6.30%
• 1M: -4.39%
• YTD: -3.82%
• 6M: -23.48%
• 1Y: 18.43%
• 3Y*: -16.31%
• 5Y*: -6.06%
• 10Y*: 1.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ULS vs. VC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULS

ULS Risk / Return Rank: 79
ULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ULS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ULS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

VC

VC Risk / Return Rank: 55
VC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
VC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULS vs. VC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Visteon Corporation (VC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ULS	VC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.49	+0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	0.94	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.12	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	0.51	+1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	1.06	+4.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ULS vs. VC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULS Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the VC Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULS and VC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ULS	VC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	0.49	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.18	+1.56

Correlation

The correlation between ULS and VC is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ULS vs. VC - Dividend Comparison

ULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VC's 1.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ULS UL Solutions Inc	0.62%	0.66%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VC Visteon Corporation	1.02%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	54.02%

Drawdowns

ULS vs. VC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULS drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum VC drawdown of -70.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULS and VC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULS	VC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.34%	-70.89%	+46.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.34%	-33.97%	+9.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.86%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.87%	-46.33%	+40.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-22.89%	+17.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.40%	16.35%	-6.95%

Volatility

ULS vs. VC - Volatility Comparison

UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Visteon Corporation (VC) have volatilities of 9.57% and 9.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULS	VC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	9.48%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.81%	26.73%	+3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.33%	37.85%	+2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.50%	38.97%	-4.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.50%	41.32%	-6.82%

Financials

ULS vs. VC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UL Solutions Inc and Visteon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ULS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 385.82M and revenue of 789.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.

VC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.00M and revenue of 948.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

ULS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 118.35M and revenue of 789.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

VC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported an operating income of 68.00M and revenue of 948.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

ULS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 71.00M and revenue of 789.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

VC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Visteon Corporation reported a net income of 276.00M and revenue of 948.00M, resulting in a net margin of 29.1%.