ULS vs. AMD
ULS (UL Solutions Inc) and AMD (Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.) are both stocks. ULS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while AMD operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past year, ULS returned 40.78% vs 362.47% for AMD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ULS vs. AMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULS achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly lower than AMD's 153.32% return.
ULS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMD
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- 58.85%
- YTD
- 153.32%
- 6M
- 149.32%
- 1Y
- 362.47%
- 3Y*
- 66.35%
- 5Y*
- 46.07%
- 10Y*
- 62.75%
ULS vs. AMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 24.71% | 59.33% | 43.88% |
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 153.32% | 77.30% | -26.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULS and AMD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
ULS:
$20.00B
AMD:
$895.16B
ULS:
$1.71
AMD:
$3.05
ULS:
57.16
AMD:
177.90
ULS:
5.14
AMD:
4.75
ULS:
6.42
AMD:
23.79
ULS:
14.97
AMD:
13.89
ULS:
$3.11B
AMD:
$37.45B
ULS:
$1.54B
AMD:
$18.83B
ULS:
$725.35M
AMD:
$7.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULS vs. AMD — Risk / Return Rank
ULS
AMD
ULS vs. AMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULS | AMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.66 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 13.16 | -11.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 27.28 | -22.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULS | AMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 5.64 | -4.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.17 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
ULS vs. AMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULS drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, smaller than the maximum AMD drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULS and AMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULS | AMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -96.59% | +72.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.34% | -27.76% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -65.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | 0.00% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -56.68% | +51.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.53% | 13.36% | -3.83% |
Volatility
ULS vs. AMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) is 17.28%, while Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) has a volatility of 24.11%. This indicates that ULS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULS | AMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 24.11% | -6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.27% | 47.17% | -14.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.32% | 64.84% | -23.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 55.25% | -19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 56.83% | -20.97% |
Dividends
ULS vs. AMD - Dividend Comparison
ULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while AMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULS UL Solutions Inc | 0.56% | 0.66% | 0.75% |
Financials
ULS vs. AMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UL Solutions Inc and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ULS vs. AMD - Profitability Comparison
ULS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 381.00M and revenue of 758.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.
AMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.42B and revenue of 10.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.
ULS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
AMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
ULS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
AMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. reported a net income of 1.38B and revenue of 10.25B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ULS and AMD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMD has higher volatility (24.11%) compared to ULS (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULS dropped -24.34% vs AMD's -96.59%.
AMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.64 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULS and AMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer