PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULS vs. TLGPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ULS vs. TLGPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Telstra Corporation Limited (TLGPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULS achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than TLGPY's 9.37% return.


ULS

1D
-0.56%
1M
-5.52%
6M
30.90%
YTD
16.58%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
54.71%

TLGPY

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.17%
6M
6.15%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.08M$2.77M$1.75M
$63.17M$75.57M$90.09M

ULS vs. TLGPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ULS
UL Solutions Inc
16.58%59.33%46.87%
TLGPY
Telstra Corporation Limited
9.37%38.47%3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between ULS and TLGPY is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ULS:

$18.44B

TLGPY:

$39.37B

EPS

ULS:

$1.71

TLGPY:

A$1.73

PE Ratio

ULS:

53.48

TLGPY:

14.52

PEG Ratio

ULS:

4.81

TLGPY:

2.15

PS Ratio

ULS:

6.01

TLGPY:

1.24

PB Ratio

ULS:

13.99

TLGPY:

4.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

ULS:

$3.11B

TLGPY:

A$46.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ULS:

$1.54B

TLGPY:

A$17.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

ULS:

$725.35M

TLGPY:

A$15.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULS vs. TLGPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ULS
ULS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TLGPY
TLGPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TLGPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLGPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLGPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TLGPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLGPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ULS vs. TLGPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UL Solutions Inc (ULS) and Telstra Corporation Limited (TLGPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULSTLGPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.03

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

2.92

-0.48

ULS vs. TLGPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULS Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the TLGPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULS and TLGPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ULS vs. TLGPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULS drawdown since its inception was -24.34%, which is greater than TLGPY's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULS and TLGPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULSTLGPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.34%

-19.28%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.34%

-14.38%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.50%

-10.85%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-5.56%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.76%

5.06%

+5.70%

Volatility

ULS vs. TLGPY - Volatility Comparison

UL Solutions Inc (ULS) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Telstra Corporation Limited (TLGPY) at 5.19%. This indicates that ULS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLGPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULSTLGPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

5.19%

+6.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.61%

12.63%

+18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.62%

16.64%

+25.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.90%

20.98%

+14.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.90%

20.98%

+14.92%

Dividends

ULS vs. TLGPY - Dividend Comparison

ULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than TLGPY's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TLGPY
Telstra Corporation Limited
3.85%3.71%4.76%9.50%
ULS
UL Solutions Inc
0.60%0.66%0.75%0.00%

Financials

ULS vs. TLGPY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UL Solutions Inc and Telstra Corporation Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ULS vs. TLGPY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UL Solutions Inc and Telstra Corporation Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ULS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 381.00M and revenue of 758.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.

TLGPY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telstra Corporation Limited reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.9%.

ULS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

TLGPY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telstra Corporation Limited reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 11.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.9%.

ULS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, UL Solutions Inc reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 758.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

TLGPY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Telstra Corporation Limited reported a net income of 1.10B and revenue of 11.43B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ULS and TLGPY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULS has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to TLGPY (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULS dropped -24.34% vs TLGPY's -19.28%.

TLGPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULS and TLGPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer