UL vs. QQQI
UL (Unilever PLC) is a stock, while QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, UL returned -9.22% vs 23.89% for QQQI. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
UL vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -5.83% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.24% return.
UL
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -6.67%
- 1Y
- -9.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UL vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UL Unilever PLC | -5.83% | 5.96% | 20.21% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.24% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and QQQI is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
UL
QQQI
UL vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.50 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 10.57 | -11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UL vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -20.00% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -9.61% | -15.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.43% | -2.98% | -14.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -2.21% | -8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.57% | 2.27% | +10.30% |
Volatility
UL vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Unilever PLC (UL) is 6.93%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 7.59% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.07% | 11.95% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 14.76% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 17.50% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 17.50% | +4.00% |
Dividends
UL vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than QQQI's 13.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.78% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.77% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and QQQI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to UL (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UL and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer