UIVM vs. JMOM
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - UIVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UIVM returned 11.85%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
UIVM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 18.61%
- 1Y
- 34.29%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
UIVM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 14.89% | 45.47% | 5.23% | 16.79% | -13.31% | 11.85% | 0.76% | 15.29% | -17.41% | 2.17% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and JMOM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between UIVM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
UIVM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UIVM
JMOM
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
UIVM
JMOM
Industrials
UIVM
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
UIVM
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
UIVM
JMOM
Healthcare
UIVM
JMOM
Technology
UIVM
JMOM
Basic Materials
UIVM
JMOM
Utilities
UIVM
JMOM
Real Estate
UIVM
JMOM
Energy
UIVM
JMOM
Communication Services
UIVM
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
JMOM
UIVM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UIVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | 2.58 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | 3.54 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.69 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 22.24 | -10.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UIVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.88 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.82 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -34.31% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -7.87% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | -19.51% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | -28.26% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.17% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -6.32% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.66% | +1.34% |
Volatility
UIVM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) at 4.62%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.62% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 11.55% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 14.32% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 18.65% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 20.13% | -2.92% |
UIVM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.22% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UIVM has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JMOM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 11.85% for UIVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JMOM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer