PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 16.68% return.


UIVM

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.17%
6M
12.63%
YTD
19.77%
1Y
34.82%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.47%

DFIV

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.37%
6M
10.06%
YTD
16.68%
1Y
37.44%
3Y*
23.26%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$76.53M$67.72M$67.89M
$137.91K$192.35K$135.04K

UIVM vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
19.77%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%-2.12%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
16.68%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and DFIV is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021

0.94

The correlation between UIVM and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

UIVM vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
DFIV

Financial Services

28.9%
34.3%

Industrials

22.1%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
5.2%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.4%

Energy

5.6%
14.1%

Basic Materials

5.4%
10.5%

Utilities

4.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

4.4%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.0%

Technology

3.2%
3.1%

Financial Services

UIVM
28.9%
DFIV
34.3%

Industrials

UIVM
22.1%
DFIV
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
7.8%
DFIV
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
6.9%
DFIV
5.2%

Healthcare

UIVM
6.7%
DFIV
5.4%

Energy

UIVM
5.6%
DFIV
14.1%

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.4%
DFIV
10.5%

Utilities

UIVM
4.5%
DFIV
2.3%

Real Estate

UIVM
4.4%
DFIV
1.7%

Communication Services

UIVM
3.9%
DFIV
4.0%

Technology

UIVM
3.2%
DFIV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UIVM vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIVMDFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.86

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

14.96

-3.50

UIVM vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and DFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-25.42%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-9.66%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-14.72%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.47%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-4.37%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.49%

+0.58%

Volatility

UIVM vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that UIVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.89%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

11.59%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

13.91%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

16.55%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.55%

+0.67%

UIVM vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than DFIV's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.58%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.06%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, UIVM and DFIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UIVM has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, UIVM leads with 24.74% vs 23.26% for DFIV. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 24.74% return vs 23.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.58% for DFIV.

UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and DFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer