PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. FIVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UIVM having a 15.57% return and FIVA slightly higher at 15.93%.


UIVM

1D
0.01%
1M
1.87%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.04%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*

FIVA

1D
0.75%
1M
4.11%
YTD
15.93%
6M
16.68%
1Y
41.51%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
15.57%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-22.18%
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
15.93%45.83%2.53%20.38%-10.37%15.90%-1.78%19.78%-18.62%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and FIVA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.91

The correlation between UIVM and FIVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

UIVM vs. FIVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
FIVA

Financial Services

30.0%
27.4%

Industrials

21.2%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
6.6%

Technology

6.6%
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.5%
8.0%

Utilities

4.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

4.5%
1.5%

Energy

4.2%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.0%

Financial Services

UIVM
30.0%
FIVA
27.4%

Industrials

UIVM
21.2%
FIVA
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
8.6%
FIVA
6.6%

Technology

UIVM
6.6%
FIVA
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
5.9%
FIVA
5.2%

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.7%
FIVA
7.7%

Healthcare

UIVM
5.5%
FIVA
8.0%

Utilities

UIVM
4.9%
FIVA
3.3%

Real Estate

UIVM
4.5%
FIVA
1.5%

Energy

UIVM
4.2%
FIVA
4.9%

Communication Services

UIVM
3.0%
FIVA
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UIVMFIVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

3.56

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

13.94

-2.41

UIVM vs. FIVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FIVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and FIVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than FIVA's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and FIVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMFIVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-39.76%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-11.71%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-14.77%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-28.70%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-7.74%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.99%

+0.04%

Volatility

UIVM vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMFIVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

5.52%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

13.24%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

15.80%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

16.43%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

17.93%

-0.69%

UIVM vs. FIVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVA's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FIVA's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.60%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%0.00%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.01%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, UIVM and FIVA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UIVM has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FIVA (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs FIVA's -39.76%.

On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 13.94% vs 12.55% for UIVM. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.60% for FIVA.

UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while FIVA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while FIVA tracks Fidelity International Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.18% for FIVA.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and FIVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer