UIVM vs. GFLW
UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) and GFLW (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while GFLW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UIVM returned 34.82% vs 21.44% for GFLW. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UIVM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GFLW.
Performance
UIVM vs. GFLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly higher than GFLW's 13.67% return.
UIVM
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.47%
GFLW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.20M | $5.66M | $3.52M | |
| $137.91K | $192.35K | $135.04K |
UIVM vs. GFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 19.77% | 45.47% | -3.28% |
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 13.67% | 18.40% | -5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UIVM and GFLW is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between UIVM and GFLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UIVM vs. GFLW — Risk / Return Rank
UIVM
GFLW
UIVM vs. GFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UIVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.16 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.31 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 4.15 | +7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UIVM vs. GFLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, which is greater than GFLW's maximum drawdown of -24.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and GFLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UIVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -24.14% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -14.95% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -6.63% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.55% | -4.54% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 4.72% | -1.65% |
Volatility
UIVM vs. GFLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 4.20%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UIVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.87% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 17.51% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 21.58% | -6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 24.84% | -9.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 24.84% | -7.62% |
UIVM vs. GFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFLW's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
UIVM vs. GFLW - Dividend Comparison
UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while GFLW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.06% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UIVM and GFLW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFLW has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to UIVM (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs GFLW's -24.14%.
On 1-year performance, UIVM leads with 34.82% vs 21.44% for GFLW. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 34.82% return vs 21.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GFLW.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for GFLW.
UIVM is categorized as Momentum, while GFLW is Large Cap Growth Equities. UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while GFLW tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.39% for GFLW.
UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UIVM and GFLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer