PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UIVM vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UIVM vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UIVM achieves a 15.98% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 42.13% return.


UIVM

1D
0.60%
1M
4.11%
YTD
15.98%
6M
19.97%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*

EEMO

1D
0.38%
1M
21.16%
YTD
42.13%
6M
43.05%
1Y
60.52%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
9.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UIVM vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
15.98%45.47%5.23%16.79%-13.31%11.85%0.76%15.29%-17.41%2.56%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
42.13%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UIVM and EEMO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.68

The correlation between UIVM and EEMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

UIVM vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UIVM
EEMO

Financial Services

30.3%
18.0%

Industrials

21.4%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
1.2%

Healthcare

5.7%
3.0%

Technology

5.7%
43.8%

Basic Materials

5.6%
12.9%

Utilities

4.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

4.7%
0.5%

Energy

4.3%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

UIVM
30.3%
EEMO
18.0%

Industrials

UIVM
21.4%
EEMO
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UIVM
8.3%
EEMO
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

UIVM
6.1%
EEMO
1.2%

Healthcare

UIVM
5.7%
EEMO
3.0%

Technology

UIVM
5.7%
EEMO
43.8%

Basic Materials

UIVM
5.6%
EEMO
12.9%

Utilities

UIVM
4.9%
EEMO
2.0%

Real Estate

UIVM
4.7%
EEMO
0.5%

Energy

UIVM
4.3%
EEMO
2.5%

Communication Services

UIVM
3.1%
EEMO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UIVM vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UIVM
UIVM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UIVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
UIVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UIVM vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UIVMEEMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

2.49

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

3.43

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.23

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.12

16.98

-4.87

UIVM vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UIVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UIVM and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UIVMEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.49

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.40

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.14

+0.34

Drawdowns

UIVM vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UIVM drawdown since its inception was -42.73%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UIVM and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UIVMEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.73%

-48.47%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-14.75%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

-26.06%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-34.03%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-20.18%

+10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.67%

-0.67%

Volatility

UIVM vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is 5.30%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that UIVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UIVMEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

14.14%

-8.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

22.08%

-9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

24.42%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

19.33%

-3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

21.58%

-4.37%

UIVM vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UIVM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

UIVM vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than EEMO's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.61%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
UIVM
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
3.19%3.70%5.09%4.35%3.03%3.48%1.63%3.49%2.78%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UIVM and EEMO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to UIVM (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UIVM dropped -42.73% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 5-year performance, UIVM leads with 12.24% vs 7.73% for EEMO. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 12.24% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UIVM.

UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.61% for EEMO.

UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UIVM and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UIVM and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer