UHS vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) is a stock, while LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.18%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for LIT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UHS vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.98% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 28.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed LIT with an annualized return of 1.18%, while LIT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.

UHS

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: -12.10%
• YTD: -32.98%
• 6M: -36.51%
• 1Y: -22.46%
• 3Y*: 2.94%
• 5Y*: -1.31%
• 10Y*: 1.18%

LIT

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -5.85%
• YTD: 28.40%
• 6M: 34.19%
• 1Y: 125.46%
• 3Y*: 10.73%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHS vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	-32.98%	22.02%	18.19%	8.83%	9.37%	-5.16%	-4.00%	23.62%	3.16%	6.93%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	28.40%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	36.74%	127.88%	3.27%	-28.63%	64.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and LIT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2010	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between UHS and LIT has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

UHS vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHS

UHS Risk / Return Rank: 13
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 13
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 93
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHS vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UHS	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.71	3.86	-4.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	4.23	-5.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.56	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	9.62	-10.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	32.28	-33.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UHS vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UHS	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.71	3.86	-4.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.14	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.47	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.26	+0.18

Drawdowns

UHS vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	UHS	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.27%	-65.91%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.52%	-13.11%	-28.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.52%	-53.01%	+11.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.90%	-65.91%	+21.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.30%	-65.91%	+9.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.11%	-10.23%	-29.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.79%	-33.63%	+18.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.10%	3.90%	+12.20%

Volatility

UHS vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 6.64%, while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UHS	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	8.66%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.08%	22.09%	+2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.88%	32.75%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.77%	31.81%	-0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.36%	30.66%	+3.70%

Dividends

UHS vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, more than LIT's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.38%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	0.41%	0.37%	0.45%	0.52%	0.57%	0.62%	0.15%	0.42%	0.34%	0.35%	0.38%	0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UHS and LIT in my portfolio?

UHS and LIT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UHS or LIT?

LIT has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to UHS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs LIT's -65.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.