PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHS vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

UHS vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UHS vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
-18.30%22.02%18.19%8.83%9.37%-5.16%-4.00%23.62%3.16%6.93%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-5.88%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UHS:

$11.47B

AAPL:

$3.79T

EPS

UHS:

$22.97

AAPL:

$7.89

PE Ratio

UHS:

7.75

AAPL:

32.39

PEG Ratio

UHS:

0.34

AAPL:

4.26

PS Ratio

UHS:

0.66

AAPL:

8.76

PB Ratio

UHS:

1.56

AAPL:

42.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHS:

$17.36B

AAPL:

$435.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHS:

$11.64B

AAPL:

$206.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

UHS:

$2.72B

AAPL:

$150.07B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -18.30% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 4.00%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.22% annualized return.


UHS

1D
-0.58%
1M
-13.80%
YTD
-18.30%
6M
-12.41%
1Y
-4.88%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
4.00%

AAPL

1D
0.73%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-5.88%
6M
0.26%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
16.37%
10Y*
26.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHS vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHS
UHS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHS vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UHSAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

0.48

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.03

0.93

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.13

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.68

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.44

2.10

-2.55

UHS vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UHSAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

0.48

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.60

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.91

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.43

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and AAPL is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UHS vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.45%0.37%0.45%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.41%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%

Drawdowns

UHS vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and AAPL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UHSAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.27%

-81.80%

+21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.00%

-22.99%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.90%

-33.36%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.30%

-38.52%

-17.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.00%

-10.59%

-16.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-29.71%

+14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.10%

7.41%

+3.69%

Volatility

UHS vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 5.72% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UHSAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

5.65%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.97%

15.11%

+7.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.15%

31.61%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.25%

27.46%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.11%

28.93%

+5.18%

Financials

UHS vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
4.49B
143.76B
(UHS) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UHS vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
48.2%
Portfolio components
UHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

UHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 517.23M and revenue of 4.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

UHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 445.94M and revenue of 4.49B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.