PortfoliosLab logo
UHS vs. AMZN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UHS and AMZN is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

UHS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UHS:

0.32

AMZN:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

UHS:

0.67

AMZN:

0.65

Omega Ratio

UHS:

1.09

AMZN:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

UHS:

0.32

AMZN:

0.32

Martin Ratio

UHS:

0.63

AMZN:

0.85

Ulcer Index

UHS:

17.53%

AMZN:

11.67%

Daily Std Dev

UHS:

34.53%

AMZN:

34.56%

Max Drawdown

UHS:

-60.27%

AMZN:

-94.40%

Current Drawdown

UHS:

-17.87%

AMZN:

-15.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UHS:

$12.76B

AMZN:

$2.18T

EPS

UHS:

$17.81

AMZN:

$6.15

PE Ratio

UHS:

11.11

AMZN:

33.43

PEG Ratio

UHS:

1.87

AMZN:

2.27

PS Ratio

UHS:

0.79

AMZN:

3.36

PB Ratio

UHS:

1.86

AMZN:

7.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHS:

$16.08B

AMZN:

$650.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHS:

$8.17B

AMZN:

$295.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

UHS:

$2.35B

AMZN:

$115.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's -6.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 5.01%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.59% annualized return.


UHS

YTD

10.45%

1M

13.24%

6M

-1.65%

1Y

11.84%

5Y*

15.19%

10Y*

5.01%

AMZN

YTD

-6.29%

1M

19.11%

6M

1.47%

1Y

11.31%

5Y*

11.16%

10Y*

25.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UHS vs. AMZN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UHS is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UHS is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UHS is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UHS is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UHS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UHS is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMZN is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMZN is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMZN is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMZN is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UHS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and AMZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

UHS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.40%0.45%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%0.27%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UHS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and AMZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UHS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) at 11.76%. This indicates that UHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UHS vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
4.10B
155.67B
(UHS) Total Revenue
(AMZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UHS vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
11.1%
34.8%
(UHS) Gross Margin
(AMZN) Gross Margin
UHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 454.83M and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.1%.

AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.10B and revenue of 155.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

UHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 454.83M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.41B and revenue of 155.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

UHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 316.68M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Amazon.com, Inc. reported a net income of 17.13B and revenue of 155.67B, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.