UHS vs. AMZN
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 3.45%/yr vs 21.72%/yr for AMZN. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UHS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -22.56% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 3.45%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- 6M
- -16.11%
- YTD
- -22.56%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.23%
AMZN
- 1D
- 15.32%
- 1M
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 27.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | $13.00B | $11.21B | $12.30B |
| $196.29M | $163.61M | $167.22M |
UHS vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -22.56% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 17.66% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and AMZN is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1997 | 0.21 |
The correlation between UHS and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$10.20B
AMZN:
$2.92T
UHS:
$31.93
AMZN:
$12.44
UHS:
5.28
AMZN:
21.82
UHS:
0.23
AMZN:
0.53
UHS:
0.44
AMZN:
3.81
UHS:
$18.11B
AMZN:
$775.68B
UHS:
$8.80B
AMZN:
$393.81B
UHS:
$2.82B
AMZN:
$254.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
AMZN
UHS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 0.74 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 1.58 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -94.40% | +34.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.00% | -21.74% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.00% | -30.88% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.73% | -55.73% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -56.15% | -0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.80% | -1.24% | -29.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -28.11% | +13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.71% | 10.26% | +11.45% |
Volatility
UHS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) is 12.36%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 16.52%. This indicates that UHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 16.52% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.12% | 26.50% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 35.20% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 36.27% | -4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 33.00% | +1.50% |
Dividends
UHS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.47% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UHS vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 104.83B and revenue of 200.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 516.68M and revenue of 4.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 27.46B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 358.45M and revenue of 4.64B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 62.65B and revenue of 200.61B, resulting in a net margin of 31.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and AMZN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to UHS (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer