UHS vs. HCA

In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than HCA's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed HCA with an annualized return of 5.36%, while HCA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UHS Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the HCA Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHS and HCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than HCA's 0.89% yield.

The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, which is greater than HCA's maximum drawdown of -54.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and HCA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to HCA Healthcare, Inc. (HCA) at 4.22%. This indicates that UHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and HCA Healthcare, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.