UHS vs. GIC
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) and GIC (Global Industrial Company) are both stocks. UHS operates in Medical Care Facilities (Healthcare), while GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, UHS returned 1.37%/yr vs 21.48%/yr for GIC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UHS vs. GIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UHS achieves a -32.68% return, which is significantly lower than GIC's 11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, UHS has underperformed GIC with an annualized return of 1.37%, while GIC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.48% annualized return.
UHS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- -32.68%
- 6M
- -34.07%
- 1Y
- -14.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
GIC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
UHS vs. GIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -32.68% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
GIC Global Industrial Company | 11.00% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UHS and GIC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1995 | 0.21 |
The correlation between UHS and GIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UHS:
$31.29
GIC:
$1.96
UHS:
4.68
GIC:
16.28
UHS:
0.20
GIC:
15.54
UHS:
0.40
GIC:
0.87
UHS:
$17.76B
GIC:
$1.41B
UHS:
$12.01B
GIC:
$500.00M
UHS:
$2.79B
GIC:
$106.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UHS vs. GIC — Risk / Return Rank
UHS
GIC
UHS vs. GIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) and Global Industrial Company (GIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UHS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.76 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.42 | -2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UHS vs. GIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UHS drawdown since its inception was -60.27%, smaller than the maximum GIC drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHS and GIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UHS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.27% | -98.09% | +37.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.52% | -30.04% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.52% | -53.19% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -53.19% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.30% | -55.74% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.85% | -25.96% | -13.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -58.91% | +44.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 16.02% | +1.31% |
Volatility
UHS vs. GIC - Volatility Comparison
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a higher volatility of 7.25% compared to Global Industrial Company (GIC) at 4.33%. This indicates that UHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UHS | GIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.25% | 4.33% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 20.62% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.46% | 41.31% | -9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.82% | 39.21% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.37% | 46.36% | -11.99% |
Dividends
UHS vs. GIC - Dividend Comparison
UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than GIC's 3.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.39% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 0.00% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Financials
UHS vs. GIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Health Services, Inc. and Global Industrial Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UHS vs. GIC - Profitability Comparison
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 502.86M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 348.68M and revenue of 4.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UHS and GIC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHS has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to GIC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHS dropped -60.27% vs GIC's -98.09%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UHS and GIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer