GIC vs. NWL
GIC (Global Industrial Company) and NWL (Newell Brands Inc.) are both stocks. GIC operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while NWL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, GIC returned 22.96%/yr vs -16.73%/yr for NWL. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIC vs. NWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIC achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly lower than NWL's 55.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GIC has outperformed NWL with an annualized return of 22.96%, while NWL has yielded a comparatively lower -16.73% annualized return.
GIC
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 19.14%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 22.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
NWL
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- 6M
- 36.47%
- YTD
- 55.91%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- -15.72%
- 5Y*
- -22.11%
- 10Y*
- -16.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.44M | $3.47M | $3.91M | |
| $56.60M | $52.45M | $54.66M |
GIC vs. NWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 24.60% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 55.91% | -60.51% | 18.96% | -30.93% | -37.02% | 6.75% | 16.73% | 9.43% | -37.53% | -29.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIC and NWL is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1995 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GIC and NWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIC:
$1.37B
NWL:
$2.38B
GIC:
$1.96
NWL:
-$0.52
GIC:
0.97
NWL:
0.33
GIC:
2.36
NWL:
0.98
GIC:
$1.41B
NWL:
$7.25B
GIC:
$500.00M
NWL:
$2.57B
GIC:
$106.30M
NWL:
$312.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIC vs. NWL — Risk / Return Rank
GIC
NWL
GIC vs. NWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Industrial Company (GIC) and Newell Brands Inc. (NWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIC | NWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.13 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.53 | 0.22 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIC vs. NWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIC drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than NWL's maximum drawdown of -91.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIC and NWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIC | NWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -91.86% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -51.33% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -72.28% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -85.96% | +32.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.74% | -91.86% | +36.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.89% | -84.52% | +67.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.75% | -34.99% | -23.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.39% | 30.57% | -14.18% |
Volatility
GIC vs. NWL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Industrial Company (GIC) is 6.52%, while Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) has a volatility of 18.00%. This indicates that GIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIC | NWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 18.00% | -11.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.45% | 41.93% | -20.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 59.94% | -28.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.22% | 54.78% | -15.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.26% | 49.35% | -3.09% |
Dividends
GIC vs. NWL - Dividend Comparison
GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than NWL's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.02% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 0.00% |
NWL Newell Brands Inc. | 5.00% | 7.53% | 2.81% | 5.07% | 7.03% | 4.21% | 4.33% | 4.79% | 4.95% | 2.85% | 1.70% | 1.72% |
Financials
GIC vs. NWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Industrial Company and Newell Brands Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIC vs. NWL - Profitability Comparison
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
NWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 812.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
NWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported an operating income of 283.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
NWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newell Brands Inc. reported a net income of 106.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIC and NWL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWL has higher volatility (18.00%) compared to GIC (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIC dropped -98.09% vs NWL's -91.86%.
GIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIC and NWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer