PortfoliosLab logo
GIC vs. SAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GIC and SAR is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GIC vs. SAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global Industrial Company (GIC) and Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
224.47%
36.48%
GIC
SAR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIC:

-0.61

SAR:

0.68

Sortino Ratio

GIC:

-0.67

SAR:

0.76

Omega Ratio

GIC:

0.90

SAR:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

GIC:

-0.44

SAR:

0.74

Martin Ratio

GIC:

-1.04

SAR:

2.83

Ulcer Index

GIC:

22.33%

SAR:

3.74%

Daily Std Dev

GIC:

38.27%

SAR:

21.71%

Max Drawdown

GIC:

-98.09%

SAR:

-90.83%

Current Drawdown

GIC:

-42.31%

SAR:

-8.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIC:

$982.04M

SAR:

$357.37M

EPS

GIC:

$1.58

SAR:

$2.51

PE Ratio

GIC:

16.20

SAR:

9.92

PEG Ratio

GIC:

1.11

SAR:

0.00

PS Ratio

GIC:

0.75

SAR:

2.32

PB Ratio

GIC:

3.45

SAR:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIC:

$1.31B

SAR:

$72.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIC:

$453.20M

SAR:

$45.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

GIC:

$88.40M

SAR:

$18.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIC achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than SAR's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GIC has outperformed SAR with an annualized return of 16.99%, while SAR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.79% annualized return.


GIC

YTD

5.90%

1M

23.26%

6M

-9.63%

1Y

-23.38%

5Y*

9.66%

10Y*

16.99%

SAR

YTD

-0.01%

1M

6.94%

6M

1.05%

1Y

14.59%

5Y*

23.11%

10Y*

13.79%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIC vs. SAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIC is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIC is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIC is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIC is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIC is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIC is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SAR is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SAR is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SAR is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SAR is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SAR is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SAR is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIC vs. SAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Industrial Company (GIC) and Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the SAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIC and SAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.000.001.002.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.61
0.68
GIC
SAR

Dividends

GIC vs. SAR - Dividend Comparison

GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than SAR's 15.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIC
Global Industrial Company
3.89%4.03%2.06%3.06%4.01%9.53%1.91%39.51%1.05%1.14%0.00%0.00%
SAR
Saratoga Investment Corp.
15.23%12.33%10.90%11.02%6.16%6.57%6.61%10.35%10.51%9.12%14.14%1.21%

Drawdowns

GIC vs. SAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIC drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than SAR's maximum drawdown of -90.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIC and SAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-42.31%
-8.61%
GIC
SAR

Volatility

GIC vs. SAR - Volatility Comparison

Global Industrial Company (GIC) has a higher volatility of 16.72% compared to Saratoga Investment Corp. (SAR) at 12.16%. This indicates that GIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.72%
12.16%
GIC
SAR

Financials

GIC vs. SAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Industrial Company and Saratoga Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
321.00M
11.84M
(GIC) Total Revenue
(SAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items