GIC vs. MATW
GIC (Global Industrial Company) and MATW (Matthews International Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GIC in Industrial Distribution, MATW in Conglomerates. Over the past 10 years, GIC returned 22.34%/yr vs -4.38%/yr for MATW. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIC vs. MATW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIC achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than MATW's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GIC has outperformed MATW with an annualized return of 22.34%, while MATW has yielded a comparatively lower -4.38% annualized return.
GIC
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 10.29%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
MATW
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- -9.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
GIC vs. MATW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 14.35% | 22.45% | -34.29% | 69.66% | -41.04% | 18.77% | 62.74% | 7.69% | -1.33% | 286.91% |
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 1.87% | -1.50% | -21.25% | 23.36% | -14.50% | 27.72% | -20.49% | -3.95% | -21.88% | -30.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIC and MATW is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1995 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GIC and MATW shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIC:
$1.96
MATW:
$0.41
GIC:
16.77
MATW:
63.04
GIC:
16.01
MATW:
0.20
GIC:
0.89
MATW:
0.51
GIC:
$1.41B
MATW:
$1.21B
GIC:
$500.00M
MATW:
$432.86M
GIC:
$106.30M
MATW:
$201.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIC vs. MATW — Risk / Return Rank
GIC
MATW
GIC vs. MATW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global Industrial Company (GIC) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIC | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.85 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 4.26 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIC vs. MATW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIC drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than MATW's maximum drawdown of -75.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIC and MATW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIC | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -75.27% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -15.87% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -58.68% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | -58.68% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.74% | -75.27% | +19.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.73% | -55.94% | +32.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.88% | -24.75% | -34.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 6.88% | +9.26% |
Volatility
GIC vs. MATW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global Industrial Company (GIC) is 4.94%, while Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that GIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIC | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 8.62% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 21.67% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.42% | 33.95% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.18% | 36.34% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.39% | 36.97% | +9.42% |
Dividends
GIC vs. MATW - Dividend Comparison
GIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than MATW's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIC Global Industrial Company | 3.29% | 3.56% | 4.03% | 2.06% | 3.06% | 4.01% | 9.92% | 1.91% | 39.51% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 0.00% |
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 3.89% | 3.85% | 4.37% | 2.54% | 2.92% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 2.12% | 1.90% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 1.01% |
Financials
GIC vs. MATW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Global Industrial Company and Matthews International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIC vs. MATW - Profitability Comparison
GIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a gross profit of 121.90M and revenue of 350.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
MATW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.98M and revenue of 258.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
GIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
MATW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of -3.18M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
GIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Industrial Company reported a net income of 16.60M and revenue of 350.40M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
MATW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -21.83M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in a net margin of -8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIC and MATW have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MATW has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to GIC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIC dropped -98.09% vs MATW's -75.27%.
MATW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIC and MATW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer