UDOW vs. MVV
UDOW (ProShares UltraPro Dow30) and MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UDOW tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%) while MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UDOW returned 23.30%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for MVV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UDOW vs. MVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 25.92% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed MVV with an annualized return of 23.30%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.66% annualized return.
UDOW
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 53.13%
- 3Y*
- 33.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 23.30%
MVV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 25.92%
- 6M
- 25.76%
- 1Y
- 44.85%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
UDOW vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 12.27% | 24.46% | 28.47% | 32.72% | -32.39% | 65.67% | -17.15% | 75.24% | -23.86% | 99.07% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 25.92% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDOW and MVV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between UDOW and MVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDOW vs. MVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDOW
MVV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
UDOW
MVV
Industrials
UDOW
MVV
Technology
UDOW
MVV
Healthcare
UDOW
MVV
Consumer Cyclical
UDOW
MVV
Consumer Defensive
UDOW
MVV
Basic Materials
UDOW
MVV
Energy
UDOW
MVV
Communication Services
UDOW
MVV
Real Estate
UDOW
-
MVV
Utilities
UDOW
-
MVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDOW vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank
UDOW
MVV
UDOW vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDOW | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.55 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.75 | 8.74 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDOW | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.17 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.32 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.26 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
UDOW vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and MVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDOW | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.29% | -85.54% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.07% | -17.68% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.83% | -44.80% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.79% | -45.53% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.29% | -69.19% | -11.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.38% | -0.14% | -3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -20.55% | +6.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 5.14% | +2.76% |
Volatility
UDOW vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) have volatilities of 8.80% and 8.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDOW | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.80% | 8.53% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.61% | 22.65% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.12% | 31.22% | +4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.19% | 39.63% | +4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 42.36% | +9.40% |
UDOW vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UDOW and MVV have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UDOW vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison
UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than MVV's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
UDOW ProShares UltraPro Dow30 | 1.21% | 1.38% | 0.95% | 0.95% | 0.83% | 0.26% | 0.19% | 0.61% | 0.73% | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDOW and MVV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UDOW has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to MVV (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs MVV's -85.54%.
On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.30% vs 13.66% for MVV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 8.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.30% return vs 13.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UDOW and MVV have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.68% for MVV.
UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%).
UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDOW and MVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer