PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 21.77% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 23.33%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.


UDOW

1D
1.49%
1M
-3.04%
6M
16.89%
YTD
21.77%
1Y
57.52%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
23.33%
ALL TIME*
26.31%

TQQQ

1D
2.09%
1M
-11.90%
6M
20.14%
YTD
23.06%
1Y
56.87%
3Y*
43.81%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
39.46%
ALL TIME*
42.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.37B$4.57B$5.33B
$115.52M$112.86M$144.33M

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
21.77%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
23.06%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and TQQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.75

The correlation between UDOW and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
TQQQ

Financial Services

32.9%
0.2%

Industrials

8.8%
2.8%

Technology

8.2%
53.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
12.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Energy

1.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

UDOW
32.9%
TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

UDOW
8.8%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

UDOW
8.2%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

UDOW
6.9%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
5.1%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

UDOW
2.4%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
2.0%
TQQQ
7.7%

Basic Materials

UDOW
1.8%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

UDOW
1.1%
TQQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

UDOW

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

UDOW

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDOWTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.29

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

3.60

+2.93

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-81.66%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-36.97%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-58.04%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-81.66%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-81.66%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-25.74%

+21.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.28%

-18.49%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

13.24%

-5.35%

Volatility

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 11.22%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.22%

20.41%

-9.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.30%

47.79%

-18.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.40%

57.62%

-20.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.31%

68.04%

-23.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.76%

66.57%

-14.81%

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UDOW and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UDOW vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.58%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.10%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to UDOW (11.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs 23.33% for UDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 11.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs 23.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDOW and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer