HIDV vs. DLN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. HIDV is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HIDV returned 21.10%/yr vs 18.17%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HIDV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.

Performance

HIDV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HIDV having a 10.08% return and DLN slightly higher at 10.10%.

HIDV

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 9.64%
• 1Y: 26.88%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DLN

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 22.40%
• 3Y*: 18.17%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	10.08%	14.64%	26.01%	20.30%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	10.10%	15.53%	19.66%	12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and DLN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023	0.87

The correlation between HIDV and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HIDV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV

HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 68
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

DLN

DLN Risk / Return Rank: 80
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIDV	DLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.49	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	3.54	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.69	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	15.49	-3.37

HIDV vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and DLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIDV	DLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	-57.84%	+39.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.57%	-6.10%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.76%	-13.71%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-0.99%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-7.51%	+5.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.45%	+0.77%

Volatility

HIDV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that HIDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIDV	DLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	2.78%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	7.00%	+2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.24%	9.04%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	13.27%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	16.17%	-1.60%

HIDV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIDV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than DLN's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	1.79%	1.90%	2.00%	2.43%	2.53%	2.01%	2.66%	2.51%	2.90%	2.33%	2.64%	2.80%
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF	2.35%	2.22%	2.29%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIDV and DLN in my portfolio?

HIDV and DLN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIDV or DLN?

HIDV has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs DLN's -57.84%.

Which ETF is better, HIDV or DLN?

On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 21.10% vs 18.17% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIDV or DLN?

Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 21.10% return vs 18.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIDV or DLN?

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIDV or DLN?

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.

What is the main difference between HIDV and DLN?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.28% for DLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.