PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 15.88% return.


UDIV

1D
1.29%
1M
1.62%
YTD
14.34%
6M
14.67%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
12.02%

DIVB

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.88%
6M
15.71%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
14.34%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%3.72%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
15.88%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and DIVB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.80

The correlation between UDIV and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.42

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

4.03

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

13.51

+3.14

UDIV vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-36.93%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-6.82%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-15.45%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-21.08%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-2.16%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-4.97%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.03%

-0.12%

Volatility

UDIV vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.62%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

8.81%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

11.67%

+0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

15.27%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

18.37%

-2.07%

UDIV vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UDIV vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than DIVB's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.29%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.10%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDIV and DIVB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to DIVB (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 5-year performance, UDIV leads with 14.57% vs 12.72% for DIVB. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DIVB has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.

UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.05% for DIVB.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer