PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVB vs. PKW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVB vs. PKW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 25.34% return, which is significantly higher than PKW's 9.81% return.


DIVB

1D
0.26%
1M
3.88%
6M
20.82%
YTD
25.34%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.50%

PKW

1D
0.11%
1M
2.76%
6M
8.82%
YTD
9.81%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.36M$10.66M$7.75M
$6.57M$4.57M$3.97M

DIVB vs. PKW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
25.34%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
9.81%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVB and PKW is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.90

The correlation between DIVB and PKW shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVB vs. PKW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVB vs. PKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVBPKWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.11

2.38

+2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.69

7.60

+10.09

DIVB vs. PKW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVB Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the PKW Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVB and PKW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVB vs. PKW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum PKW drawdown of -54.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and PKW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVBPKWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-54.59%

+17.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-7.86%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-20.91%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-23.51%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.80%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-7.90%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.46%

-0.49%

Volatility

DIVB vs. PKW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) at 3.43%. This indicates that DIVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVBPKWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

3.43%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

9.60%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

13.21%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

17.39%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

19.70%

-1.35%

DIVB vs. PKW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PKW's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVB vs. PKW - Dividend Comparison

DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than PKW's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.12%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%0.00%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.77%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVB and PKW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to PKW (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVB dropped -36.93% vs PKW's -54.59%.

On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 13.37% vs 11.31% for PKW. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.77% for PKW.

DIVB is categorized as Dividend, while PKW is Mid Cap Value Equities. DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for DIVB and 0.62% for PKW.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVB and PKW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer