UCC vs. QLD
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UCC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCC returned 14.02%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UCC vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UCC has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 14.02%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.
UCC
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 6M
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- 8.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
UCC vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -8.01% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 53.76% | -4.94% | 42.05% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and QLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2007 | 0.75 |
The correlation between UCC and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
QLD
UCC vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 3.42 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 11.92 | -11.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.70 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.58 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.81 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.60 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
UCC vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -83.13% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -25.13% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | -42.29% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -63.68% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | -63.68% | +1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.87% | -0.53% | -17.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -18.17% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | 7.20% | +2.90% |
Volatility
UCC vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 8.90% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.42% | 24.08% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.21% | 31.85% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.60% | 44.74% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.62% | 44.56% | -3.94% |
UCC vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UCC and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UCC vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and QLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCC has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 14.02% for UCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCC and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCC and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer