UCC vs. ROM
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UCC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%) while ROM tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCC returned 13.40%/yr vs 37.52%/yr for ROM. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UCC vs. ROM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 37.33% return. Over the past 10 years, UCC has underperformed ROM with an annualized return of 13.40%, while ROM has yielded a comparatively higher 37.52% annualized return.
UCC
- 1D
- 6.81%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -11.97%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
ROM
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- 6M
- 38.35%
- YTD
- 37.33%
- 1Y
- 66.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 37.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.11M | $7.91M | $10.36M | |
| $269.06K | $187.07K | $175.51K |
UCC vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -10.17% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 53.76% | -4.94% | 42.05% |
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 37.33% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and ROM is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.68 |
The correlation between UCC and ROM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
ROM
UCC vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCC | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.21 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 1.84 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | 4.64 | -4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCC vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, roughly equal to the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and ROM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -83.36% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -32.33% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | -48.10% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -67.55% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | -67.55% | +5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.80% | -24.28% | +4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -20.84% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 12.79% | -0.49% |
Volatility
UCC vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) is 14.65%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 18.85%. This indicates that UCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | ROM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 18.85% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.34% | 43.73% | -13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.06% | 51.28% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 53.25% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.95% | 50.57% | -9.62% |
UCC vs. ROM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UCC and ROM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UCC vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than ROM's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.07% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.28% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and ROM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to UCC (14.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs ROM's -83.36%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 37.52% vs 13.40% for UCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 14.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 37.52% return vs 13.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCC and ROM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.07% for ROM.
UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%).
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCC and ROM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer