UCC vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
UCC and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCC is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both UCC and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UCC vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCC vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -18.49% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 5.55% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -12.40% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 16.96% | 101.99% | 10.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's -12.40% return.
UCC
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -18.49%
- 6M
- -20.58%
- 1Y
- 9.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
FNGS
- 1D
- 4.69%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -12.40%
- 6M
- -14.82%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 30.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCC vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
FNGS
UCC vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCC | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.73 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.26 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 0.84 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 2.59 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCC | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.73 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.53 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.90 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and FNGS is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UCC vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.33% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UCC vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and FNGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -48.98% | -34.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -22.93% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -48.98% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.22% | -19.32% | -7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -11.02% | -10.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.32% | 7.43% | +1.89% |
Volatility
UCC vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.31%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.63% | 8.31% | +6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.25% | 15.68% | +11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.31% | 26.98% | +20.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 29.97% | +13.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.43% | 31.34% | +9.09% |