PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCC vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCC vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 73.56% return. Over the past 10 years, UCC has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of 14.02%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -36.44% annualized return.


UCC

1D
-1.54%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-8.01%
6M
-8.22%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
14.02%

GUSH

1D
2.27%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
73.56%
6M
49.07%
1Y
75.56%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
-36.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCC vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
-8.01%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%20.92%46.55%53.76%-4.94%42.05%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
73.56%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UCC and GUSH is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2015

0.30

The correlation between UCC and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCC vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCC vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCCGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

2.62

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

6.06

-5.21

UCC vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCC and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCCGUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

1.37

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.17

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

-0.39

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

-0.44

+0.76

Drawdowns

UCC vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCCGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.05%

-99.98%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.14%

-28.94%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.01%

-63.59%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.77%

-73.64%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.77%

-99.94%

+38.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.87%

-99.79%

+81.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.81%

-92.92%

+71.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.10%

12.52%

-2.42%

Volatility

UCC vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) is 10.35%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 20.17%. This indicates that UCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCCGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

20.17%

-9.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.42%

43.47%

-17.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.21%

55.62%

-19.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.60%

68.21%

-24.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.62%

93.72%

-53.10%

UCC vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCC vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than GUSH's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.44%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services
1.18%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCC and GUSH have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (20.17%) compared to UCC (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 14.02% vs -36.44% for GUSH. On fees, UCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 10.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 14.02% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.18% for UCC.

UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCC and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer