UAMY vs. CRML

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) and CRML (Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, UAMY returned 302.77% vs 745.77% for CRML. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UAMY vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAMY achieves a 102.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRML's 73.05% return.

UAMY

• 1D: 10.04%
• 1M: -16.13%
• YTD: 102.99%
• 6M: 90.11%
• 1Y: 302.77%
• 3Y*: 214.88%
• 5Y*: 62.77%
• 10Y*: 46.76%

CRML

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -3.46%
• YTD: 73.05%
• 6M: 46.46%
• 1Y: 745.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAMY vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	102.99%	183.62%	727.49%
CRML Critical Metals Corp	73.05%	2.21%	-69.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UAMY and CRML is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024	0.33

Over the past year, UAMY and CRML have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS UAMY : -$0.13 CRML : -$0.53
PS Ratio UAMY : 33.66 CRML : 2.09K
Total Revenue (TTM) UAMY : $39.04M CRML : $560.62K
Gross Profit (TTM) UAMY : $4.34M CRML : $560.62K
EBITDA (TTM) UAMY : -$15.23M CRML : -$47.47M

Return for Risk

UAMY vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 86
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 94
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAMY vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAMY	CRML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	4.30	-1.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	4.07	-1.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.45	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	9.91	-5.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	15.03	-7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UAMY vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is lower than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAMY and CRML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAMY	CRML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	4.30	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	-0.15	+0.23

Drawdowns

UAMY vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAMY drawdown since its inception was -96.44%, roughly equal to the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAMY and CRML.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAMY	CRML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.44%	-93.91%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.30%	-77.74%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.67%	-59.93%	+18.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.43%	-68.25%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.40%	51.26%	-8.86%

Volatility

UAMY vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a higher volatility of 31.05% compared to Critical Metals Corp (CRML) at 22.34%. This indicates that UAMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAMY	CRML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.05%	22.34%	+8.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.84%	102.27%	-9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.70%	175.07%	-43.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.78%	157.34%	-62.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	101.00%	157.34%	-56.34%

Dividends

UAMY vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAMY nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UAMY and CRML in my portfolio?

UAMY and CRML have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UAMY or CRML?

UAMY has higher volatility (31.05%) compared to CRML (22.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAMY dropped -96.44% vs CRML's -93.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.