UAMY vs. PPTA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA).

Performance

UAMY vs. PPTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UAMY vs. PPTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	73.90%	183.62%	610.84%	-48.86%	-2.19%	-70.37%
PPTA Perpetua Resources Corp	16.15%	126.90%	236.59%	8.56%	-38.53%	-41.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap UAMY : $1.08B PPTA : $2.62B
EPS UAMY : -$0.03 PPTA : $1.22
PB Ratio UAMY : 7.66 PPTA : 3.04
Total Revenue (TTM) UAMY : $39.26M PPTA : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) UAMY : $9.87M PPTA : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) UAMY : -$6.89M PPTA : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAMY achieves a 73.90% return, which is significantly higher than PPTA's 16.15% return.

UAMY

• 1D: 10.93%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 73.90%
• 6M: 40.81%
• 1Y: 296.82%
• 3Y*: 184.93%
• 5Y*: 48.97%
• 10Y*: 43.25%

PPTA

• 1D: 11.10%
• 1M: -23.71%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 39.00%
• 1Y: 163.05%
• 3Y*: 84.88%
• 5Y*: 34.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UAMY vs. PPTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 88
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PPTA

PPTA Risk / Return Rank: 89
PPTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PPTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PPTA Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PPTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PPTA Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAMY vs. PPTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAMY	PPTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.02	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.32	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	4.77	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.11	11.33	-4.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UAMY vs. PPTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the PPTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAMY and PPTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAMY	PPTA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.02	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.48	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.38	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between UAMY and PPTA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UAMY vs. PPTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAMY nor PPTA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UAMY vs. PPTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAMY drawdown since its inception was -96.44%, which is greater than PPTA's maximum drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAMY and PPTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAMY	PPTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.44%	-81.78%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.30%	-32.86%	-41.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.49%	-81.78%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.03%	-24.45%	-25.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.58%	-39.28%	-27.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.77%	13.84%	+25.93%

Volatility

UAMY vs. PPTA - Volatility Comparison

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a higher volatility of 40.32% compared to Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) at 21.57%. This indicates that UAMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAMY	PPTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.32%	21.57%	+18.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.33%	56.41%	+50.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.50%	81.37%	+50.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.58%	71.25%	+22.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	100.37%	71.96%	+28.41%

Financials