UA vs. KMB
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, UA returned -16.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 22.50% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -16.19%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 17.84%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 41.35%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- -5.28%
- 5Y*
- -20.46%
- 10Y*
- -16.19%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
UA vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 22.50% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and KMB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between UA and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UA:
$2.50B
KMB:
$34.08B
UA:
-$1.16
KMB:
$5.93
UA:
0.51
KMB:
2.06
UA:
1.77
KMB:
18.98
UA:
$4.97B
KMB:
$16.54B
UA:
$2.26B
KMB:
$5.93B
UA:
-$86.93M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
UA
KMB
UA vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.87 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | -0.67 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | -1.03 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -36.97% | -54.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -29.60% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -34.06% | -26.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -34.06% | -48.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -34.06% | -55.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.14% | -26.52% | -60.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -8.85% | -60.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.26% | 19.43% | +6.83% |
Volatility
UA vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 8.42% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.31% | 16.67% | +26.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.90% | 25.77% | +28.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.27% | 20.19% | +30.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 21.07% | +29.30% |
Dividends
UA vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UA vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UA vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and KMB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs KMB's -36.97%.
UA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer