UA vs. LULU
Compare and contrast key facts about Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UA or LULU.
Key characteristics
| UA | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -20.48% | -33.84% |
| 1Y Return | -3.49% | -9.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -30.03% | 2.46% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -20.37% | 14.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.06 | -0.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.90% | 33.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -86.96% | -92.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -85.38% | -33.84% |
Fundamentals
| UA | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $44.48B |
| EPS | $0.89 | $12.21 |
| PE Ratio | 7.36 | 28.91 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.60 | 1.27 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.77B | $9.62B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.42B | $4.49B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $415.12M | $2.59B |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and LULU is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UA vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a -20.48% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -33.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UA vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UA vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither UA nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UA vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -86.96%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UA vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) is 4.85%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that UA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UA vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities