UA vs. BND
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) is a stock, while BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, UA returned -17.00%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for BND. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed BND with an annualized return of -17.00%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 1.58% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- -13.68%
- 3Y*
- -9.37%
- 5Y*
- -22.55%
- 10Y*
- -17.00%
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
UA vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 10.42% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and BND is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2016 | 0.03 |
The correlation between UA and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
UA
BND
UA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.24 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.92 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 5.80 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 1.36 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.01 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.34 | 0.29 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.59 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
UA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -18.58% | -72.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -2.68% | -40.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -5.92% | -54.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -17.91% | -64.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -18.58% | -71.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.41% | -2.37% | -86.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -3.06% | -66.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.82% | 0.88% | +24.94% |
Volatility
UA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 22.60% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.60% | 1.23% | +21.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.22% | 2.66% | +40.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.62% | 3.78% | +49.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 6.02% | +44.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.36% | 5.53% | +44.83% |
Dividends
UA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and BND have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (22.60%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs BND's -18.58%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer