UA vs. BND
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) is a stock, while BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, UA returned -16.36%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for BND. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UA vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed BND with an annualized return of -16.36%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 1.56% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 6M
- 29.26%
- 1Y
- -13.96%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- -21.34%
- 10Y*
- -16.36%
BND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
UA vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 16.88% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.49% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and BND is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, UA and BND have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
UA
BND
UA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.59 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 4.52 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -18.58% | -72.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.86% | -2.68% | -40.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -5.92% | -54.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -17.91% | -64.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -18.58% | -71.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.73% | -2.15% | -85.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -3.06% | -66.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.59% | 0.94% | +25.65% |
Volatility
UA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a higher volatility of 14.05% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.08%. This indicates that UA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.05% | 1.08% | +12.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.67% | 2.77% | +40.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.65% | 3.74% | +48.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.37% | 6.03% | +44.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.42% | 5.53% | +44.89% |
Dividends
UA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
UA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and BND have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UA has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to BND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs BND's -18.58%.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer